Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove responders gem #2901

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2024
Merged

Remove responders gem #2901

merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

tvdeyen
Copy link
Member

@tvdeyen tvdeyen commented May 28, 2024

What is this pull request for?

We don't need a gem for responding with JSON from a Rails controller.

Notable changes (remove if none)

Removes a not actually maintained and necessary dependency.

Checklist

We don't need a gem for responding with JSON from a Rails
controller.
@tvdeyen tvdeyen added this to the 7.2 milestone May 28, 2024
@tvdeyen tvdeyen requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2024 11:40
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.96%. Comparing base (98293af) to head (71ffa5d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2901      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.96%   95.96%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         230      230              
  Lines        6269     6267       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         6016     6014       -2     
  Misses        253      253              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tvdeyen tvdeyen merged commit cc66442 into AlchemyCMS:main May 28, 2024
36 checks passed
@tvdeyen tvdeyen deleted the remove-responders branch May 28, 2024 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants